PENGHAKIMAN PADA SIDANG DUN PERAK TIDAK SAH? - malaysiakini

yang menggemparkan adalah berita ini...kenyataan in ummi ambik dari chatbox notoumno..

yang ditulis oleh Tongkat Besi..dan dichat box ummi oleh aduka...Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman yang membuat keputusan Persidangan DUN oleh Sivakumar sebagai tidak sah ADALAH SEORANG YANG TELAH TAMAT tempuh perkhidmatannya.

Dia dilantik secara kontrak 2 tahun mulai 1 MARCH 2007 hingga 28 February 2009. Dia membuat penghakiman pada 3 March 2009. iaitu 3 hari selepastempuh khidmat dia tamat. PENGHAKIMAN dia TIDAK SAH.

Zambri memang kartun...P/s
mahkamah memang tiada hak atas urusan DUN
penghakiman oleh peruruhjaya pencen pun tidak sah. Jadi 2 kali TIDAK SAH = UMNOO GELISAH

IPOH, March 4 — With his term as judicial commissioner ending February 28, the Perak constitutional crisis has taken another twist with the question whether Ridwan Ibrahim was eligible to hear or grant a restraining order against state speaker V Sivakumar yesterday.

The Ipoh-based judicial commissioner was first appointed on March 1, 2007 to a two year term which ended last Saturday. It is not known if his term of office has been extended as the newly-minted Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) has yet to meet.

Unlike judges who have full tenure, judicial commissioners get two-year contracts under Article 122AB of the Federal Constitution and can sit to hear cases in the High Court.

A legal source said the judicial commissioners used to get extensions but now have to apply to the JAC for consideration as high court judges. baca selanjutnya di sini